|
March 2, 2004-Filed
Electronically to david.mckay@usda.gov
Conservation
Operations Division Attn: Conservation Security Program Natural Resources
Conservation Service U.S. Department of Agriculture P.O. Box 2890 Washington,
DC 20013-2890 RE:
Comments, Implementation of Conservation Security Program The
undersigned are pleased to submit comments to the Natural Resources Conservation
Service (NRCS), U.S. Department of Agriculture on the notice of proposed rulemaking
concerning implementation of the Conservation Security Program (CSP). Bees,
butterflies and other pollinator species play a critically important role in American
agriculture, in producing a healthy and affordable food supply, and in sustaining
ecosystem health. Animal pollinators play a pivotal part in the production of
an estimated one out of every three bites of food that humans eat and in the reproduction
of at least 80 percent of flowering plants. The commodities produced with the
help of animal pollinators generate significant income for agricultural producers.
It is thus in the strong economic interest of both agricultural producers and
the American consumer to help ensure a healthy, sustainable pollinator population.
Recognizing
the importance of pollinators, the Boards on Life Sciences and Agriculture and
Natural Resources of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) will jointly convene
an inventory and status assessment of North American pollinators, once necessary
funding has been secured. This information can be used to make an assessment of
the state of pollinators and what might be done to sustain their health.
The CSP offers an exceptional opportunity to reward private landowners and operators
by adding revenue to their economic bottom line for conservation practices on
working lands. With traditional pollinator species for commercial crops at risk,
national conservation security and food security objectives become one and the
same when the CSP rewards producers for voluntary pollinator-friendly practices.
Pollinator
stewardship, protection and habitat conservation should appropriately considered
throughout the process of implementing the CSP and maximizing its potential benefits
for conservation and producers-when conducting the inventory of a farm or ranch
operation to identify resource concerns and the extent of conservation treatment
already in place; in evaluating "significant resource concerns," particularly
at the state and local level; in rewarding farmers and ranchers through CSP payments
for conservation practices; and by providing appropriate technical and cost-share
assistance to farmers and ranchers who desire to install or enhance pollinator-friendly
practices. Respectfully
Submitted, | Organizations:
| Society
of American Florists | | American
Society of Agronomy | Soil
Science Society of America | | California
Citrus Quality Council | The
Bee Works, LLC | | Coevolution
Institute | The
National Grange | | Crop
Science Society of America | Turner
Foundation University of Washington Burke Museum of Natural and Cultural History | | Entomological
Foundation |
| Individuals
& Affiliation: | | Dewey
M. Caron, Professor of Entomology & Wildlife Ecology University of Delaware | | Gretchen
C. Daily, Associate Professor, Department of Biological Sciences & Senior Fellow,
Institute for International Studies, Department of Biological Sciences Stanford
University | | Clifford
S. Duke, Ph.D., Director of Science Programs Ecological Society of America | | Dr.
Richard A. Herrett, Independent Consultant | | Rhonda
Kranz, Program Manager, Science Programs Office Ecological Society of America | | Claire
Kremen, Assistant Professor Princeton University | | Gretchen
LeBuhn, Assistant Professor San Francisco State University | | Michele
F. Parlett, Water & Land Management Services Mirant Mid-Atlantic | | Jerome
G. Rosen, Jr., Curator American Museum of Natural History, New York, N.Y. | | Constance
S. Stubbs, Research Assistant Professor University of Maine |
|