For
Immediate Release Monday, June 21, 2004 Contact: Brian Kennedy, 202-226-9019
Resources
Committee to hold ESA Hearing on The Klamath Project Washington,
DC - House Resources Committee Chairman Richard Pombo (R-CA) announced today
that the Committee will hold a field hearing in Klamath Falls, Oregon on the Endangered
Species Act. The hearing, to be held at 9:00 a.m. on July 17 at the Ross Reglund
Theatre in downtown Klamath Falls, will cover the Endangered Species Act's impact
on the Klamath Project, one of the nation's oldest federal irrigation projects.
The Klamath Project was the subject of international coverage in 2001 when Endangered
Species Act regulations protecting sucker fish and coho salmon forced the bulk
of the project to virtually shut down its water delivery system for almost the
entire growing season. Local business leaders estimate that the termination of
water deliveries in 2001 inflicted $200 million worth of economic damage on the
Klamath Basin community. Although
federal and state efforts have focused on resolving the situation, the Klamath
project was nearly shut down last summer because of Endangered Species Act requirements.
Klamath irrigators face another dry summer this year, prompting many worries of
another devastating irrigation water cut-off. Meanwhile, a National Research Council
Report last year questioned some of the underlying endangered species science
behind the 2001 shut down. Rep.
Richard W. Pombo (R-CA), Chairman, Committee on Resources The water shut-off
in the Klamath Basin is a dramatic example of how, after 30 years, the Endangered
Species Act has failed the species it was designed to recover. Unintended consequences
have devastated communities. We must find a sound and balanced approach, one that
conserves species while caring for our local communities as well. This hearing
is specifically designed to discuss the abuse of this law and to find a scientific
solution to updating and improving the ESA so that further generations will not
have to suffer as the Klamath farmers have. Rep.
Ken Calvert (R-CA), Chairman, Subcommittee on Water and Power We owe the
American people the very best scientific answers when it comes to balancing human
water needs with endangered species protection. Time and again, we have found
that the Endangered Species Act needs to be updated to both improve species protection
and provide needed water to our farmers and cities. When the science has been
questioned by a team of independent, qualified biologists and that two conflicting
species regulations continue to provide environmental and water use uncertainty
in the Klamath basin, it's our duty to help provide the roadmap to resolution
and this hearing will help accomplish that. Rep.
Greg Walden (R-OR), Chairman, Subcommittee on Forests and Forest Health Time
and time again we have seen how the use of questionable science in the implementation
of the Endangered Species Act has thrown communities like the Klamath Basin into
economic upheaval with no benefit to the threatened species. During next month's
hearing we will examine the National Academy of Sciences final report that repudiated
the scientific justification behind the 2001 water shut-off. Hopefully by studying
the Klamath Basin water crisis and similar situations across the United States,
we can develop a blueprint for making common sense improvements to the ESA that
benefit both species and property owners. Rep.
John T. Doolittle (R-CA) The Klamath basin farmers have suffered long enough
at the hands of bad science and an inflexible Endangered Species Act (ESA). We
look forward to this hearing and the long over-due investigation on the impacts
of the ESA and the recommendations from the National Research Council. Rep.
Wally Herger (R-CA) The 2001 Klamath Basin water shut off was a tragedy
that could have, and should have been avoided. Thanks to the diligence of biologists,
community leaders and the National Academy of Sciences, we now know the demands
for water from our farmers is political, and completely devoid of scientific grounding.
Now, more than three years later, the Klamath farming community still faces hardships
resulting from the 2001 shut off. Along
with Congressmen Doolittle and Walden, I requested this hearing to shed national
light on how speculation and a radical agenda influenced the Klamath decision,
and how an inflexible Endangered Species Act prevented any alternatives. I would
like to thank Chairman Pombo and Chairman Calvert for agreeing to hold this hearing,
and for their continued support of sound science and Klamath Basin agriculture. |