|
- On April 7, 2003, Rep.
Greg Walden introduced "Sound Science for Endangered Species Act Planning Act
of 2003" to amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to require the Secretary
of the Interior to give greater weight to scientific or commercial data that is
empirical or has been field-tested or peer-reviewed. The bill number is H.R. 1662
and is attached in a pdf file.
- Please
urge your Representative to support Sound Science for Endangered Species Act Planning
Act of 2003.
Klamath
Basin Crisis caused by "No Sound Scientific Basis" Last year a
report by the National Academy of Sciences concluded that there was no sound scientific
basis for maintaining higher water levels in Upper Klamath Lake or Higher minimum
flows in the Klamath River for threatened species as recommended in a biological
opinion released two years ago. This biological opinion ultimately led to the
dramatic irrigation water shut-off to nearly 1200 farmers and ranchers in the
Klamath Basin of southern Oregon and northern California in April 2001. There
was no sound scientific basis for preventing water from being diverted down canals
like it had for nearly 100 years to grow crops and provide water to several national
wildlife refuges. Water that would normally flow through Klamath Project farmland
habitat and to the national wildlife refuges was directed instead towards increasing
instream water levels for the benefit of an endangered suckerfish and threatened
coho salmon. The citizens of Klamath Falls saw the collapse of the local agricultural
economy due to water restrictions imposed by the Endangered Species Act (ESA)
for the benefit of those two species protected under the ESA. The vitality of
over 430 other wildlife species was threatened when they were subjected to the
same fate as local farmers: no water, dry watercourses, drastically altered vegetation,
parched land and dust.
What would H.R. 1662 do? H.R.
1662 (Adobe
Acrobat File. Click
here to download Adobe Reader) While this is not a comprehensive ESA reform
bill, it does provide very important targeted improvements, which are long overdue,
and promotes both the interests of species recovery and of locally impacted communities.
H.R. 1662 would achieve the following improvements in the ESA:
- Improved use of peer-reviewed
science in making ESA decision
-
Improved public participation in the listing and recovery planning process
- Greater
role given to the states and local communities
- Greater
weight given to social and economic impacts
- Improved
processes to enable private landowners to have certainty and take actions to protect
species on private lands
- Greater
financial and technical assistance to states and private citizens.
Related
Legislations S.
369, the Endangered Species Listing and Delisting Process Reform Act of 2003
-- to amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to improve the processes for listing,
recovery planning, and de-listing.
H.R.
1253, the Common Sense Preble's Conservation Act -- to amend the Endangered
Species Act of 1973 to establish special requirements for determining whether
the Preble's meadow jumping mouse is an endangered species or threatened species.
H.R.
1235, the Encroachment on Military Bases Prevention Act -- to provide
for the management of critical habitat of endangered species and threatened species
on military installations in a manner compatible with the demands of military
readiness, to ensure that the application of other resource laws on military installations
is compatible with military readiness. H.R.
1194, the Species Rescue Act -- to amend the Endangered Species Act of
1973 to enable Federal agencies responsible for the preservation of threatened
species and endangered species to rescue and relocate members of any of those
species that would be taken in the course of certain reconstruction, maintenance,
or repair of Federal or non-Federal manmade flood control levees. National
Grange's policy on ESA As a member organization of the National Endangered
Species Act Reform Coalition, the National Grange has supported sound science
for ESA for both farmers and environment. Refer to our related action alerts:
Endangered
Species Act Reform Action Alert (03/20/2002) H.R.
4840, "Sound Science for Endangered Species Act Planning Act of 2002" Should
Be Passed in the House Floor in this Congress (08/07/2002) The
National Grange's policy on ESA is summarized in our policy book:
- The National Grange encourages
Congress to amend the Endangered Species Act (ESA) to restore proper perspective
by requiring public hearings and economic impact statements on the impacts to
the affected areas before a species may be listed. We support changes to the ESA
to require that only a pure biological and numerical definition of an endangered
species be used without being based on sub species, distinct populations, or hybridization.
We believe that only those species actually threatened with extinction should
be listed in the ESA, taking into consideration total populations, available habitats,
and recovery areas on the North American continent. We further support a review
of the Endangered Species Act with the following guidelines: focus on keystone
species (organisms critical to the stable functions of entire habitats and ecosystems),
not minor or reduced species; rely on public lands for preservation; encourage
voluntary protection by individuals and corporations; curtail taking of private
lands for ESA; balance human costs with ecological benefits; compensation for
private property owners for loss of usage of their property due to the Endangered
Species Act. The National Grange insists on the strictest possible interpretation
of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) on public and private development projects
in cities and urban areas. The National Grange supports legislation legally allowing
people to defend themselves from an attack by any animal listed as an endangered
species without concern of retribution from government authorities. The National
Grange reaffirms its call for complete and comprehensive reform of the Endangered
Species Act (ESA) so that it shall no longer take total precedence over property
rights, energy development, and fire suppression.
- The
National Grange opposes any reauthorization of the Clean Water Act that includes
any provision to require that a state designate any water that supports a population
of a threatened or endangered species as an Outstanding Resource Water.
- The
National Grange will actively work to reverse the actions of the Ninth Circuit
Court and permanently restore the flow of life-giving and life-sustaining water
from Klamath Lake to the farmers and farm communities served by the irrigation
systems. We urge that Congress investigate the closure of irrigation facilities
for the benefit of a suckerfish in the Klamath Falls Basin and determine the consequences
of the loss of irrigation water in the Klamath Falls Basin in Oregon and California.
Action
Plan --- Please contact your U.S. House Representative to urge them to cosponsor
H.R. 1662. If you want to find your House Representative contact information,
please click the following. House
Representative If
you have any questions or comments please contact Legislative Research Analyst
Chil-Sook Hwang by fax: 202-347-1091
or by phone: 1-888-4GRANGE, ext 109. Thank you for your grassroots participation
in the National Grange Legislative program. Want
to Subscribe To ? For
all subscription and circulation inquiries, Contact: Jonathan
Hill. |