The National Grange of the Order of Patrons of Husbandry
Action Alert Updates


EU Biotech Ban Should be Opposed

01/08/2003

 

  • European Union (EU) Enacted New Regulations Against the Biotech Foods.
  • EU Moratorium on Biotech Foods, Not Based on Scientific Evidence, Has Resulted in Lost Export Markets for U.S. Agricultural Producers Valued at $ 300 Million Annually.
  • Please, Urge the White House and U.S. Trade Representative to Take Immediate Actions to Initiate a WTO Case Against the EU Moratorium.

The EU Council of Agriculture Ministers adopted a proposal that would require products to be labeled as genetically modified if they contain 0.9 percent of biotech material. The Council of Environment Ministers also adopted traceability requirements that will require complete segregation of biotech and non-biotech products, which is virtually impossible.

The EU moratorium on biotech foods already has been in place for four years and has cost the United States $300 million annually in lost sales. Other countries that fear of losing agricultural sales to Europe are adopting policies similar to the EU's and are beginning to restrict U.S. exports.

Distrust on biotech foods has been derived from the safety concerns. However, many regulators and medical experts say that there is no scientific evidence that the biotech foods are less safe than foods produced through traditional breeding. Even European Commission has officially acknowledged the safety of biotech products. Read more As some southern African countries in the midst of famine recently rejected U.S. food aid because it included genetically modified grain the State Department announced that biotech foods are safe for Americans and Africans. Read more

Moreover, EU ban on biotech foods is a violation of WTO rules of international trade. In an effort to ensure consumer safety, the WTO established the Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS) that allows countries to set their own standards regarding food safety of imported products. However, the SPS agreement clearly states that standards set must be based on scientific evidence.

The National Grange policy on this issue is that it supports a federal policy to allow the use of biotechnology in agriculture and does not approve of using inspections, grading, health, and sanitary or labeling standards as non-tariff barriers to trade.

The National Grange and 57 other agricultural groups sent a coalition letter to Mr. Robert Zoellick, U.S. Trade Representative to express concerns regarding the EU bans on US biotech meat. The National Grange also created an article, "EU Beef Ban Violation of WTO Agreement" for the December View from the Hill.

Action Plan --- Please send a letter/email/fax and make a phone call to the White House and U.S. Trade Representative to urge the fight over the EU moratorium on biotech foods by initiating a dispute settlement case within the WTO against EU moratorium. Contact information is following;

The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500
Phone: 202-456-1111 (Comments)
202-456-1414 (Switchboard)
Fax: 202-456-2461
Email: President George W. Bush
Vice President Richard Cheney

Robert B. Zoellick
U.S. Trade Representative
600 17th Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20508
Phone: 202-395-4510

If you have any questions or comments please contact Legislative Research Analyst Chil-Sook Hwang by fax: 202-347-1091 or by phone: 1-888-4GRANGE, ext 109. Thank you for your grassroots participation in the National Grange Legislative program.

Want to Subscribe To ? For all subscription and circulation inquiries, Contact: Jonathan Hill.


NATIONAL GRANGE OF THE PATRONS OF HUSBANDRY
1616 H Street NW • Washington, DC 20006
(888) 4-GRANGE • (202) 628-3507 • Fax: (202) 347-1091
Contact National Grange Contact Webmaster